20th August 2013
Honourable Dr Kim Hames MB BS JP
MLA
Dear Minister Hames,
I am writing to you about a
planning issue at Karridale, in the shire of Augusta-Margaret River. In the
past your department has avoided dealing with my concerns by referring me to
the Minister for Planning.
I believe this is not a
thoughtful response, as the issues I am reporting are entirely concerned with
the planning process, not the plan, and the psychosocial effects on my
community. We are all aware that it is
difficult to provide mental health services to remote rural communities, and we
know that prevention is always better than any cure or post-incident intervention
and support.
For a strong socially cohesive
community, and the intangible cultural heritage that defines them, to be
destroyed merely to profit two development corporations is a wicked act.
Karridale is not being sacrificed to serve the nation, the state, or the shire,
merely to profit two private corporations.
The community have been denied
their right to consultation. We have not had any of our questions answered. We
have been lied to. The media have been lied to. Last week we were told that if
we want information about the development we must make Freedom of Information
requests and pay charges.
All of our experiences through
the past six years have eroded our belief in the democratic process, in
fairness, justice for all, and the qualities that defined all that was best
about the men and women who created this farming landscape. We honoured our
ANZACS when we celebrated the 50th anniversary of our community
group in 2009. Today we are being driven to despair. This is a community that
50 years ago tackled the impossible challenge of a natural disaster, a major
bushfire, with little more than buckets and wet sacks, and lost no lives and only
one house. Today we face a man made situation and feel impotent, hopeless and powerless.
You know that mental health and
happiness are inextricably linked to feelings of self-efficacy and today our
self-efficacy is under attack from the actions of state and local government
decisions. We could not influence those high level decisions, but we should be
allowed to influence them when they are applied at the local level. That is all
we ask for.
Strong self-efficacy beliefs
enhance human accomplishment and personal well-being in many ways. People with
a strong sense of personal competence approach difficult tasks as challenges to
be mastered, rather than as dangers to be avoided. Self-efficacy is an
essential quality for living in a remote rural environment. This quality, above
all else, identified those Group Settlers and War Service Land Settlers who
would persevere and create successful farming enterprises in the SW of WA.
People with strong feelings of
self-efficacy have greater intrinsic interest in activities, set challenging
goals and maintain a strong commitment to them, heighten their efforts in the
face of failure, and more easily recover their confidence after failures or
setbacks. They are resilient individuals, creating strong resilient
communities.
They attribute failure to having
insufficient effort or deficient knowledge and skills which they believe they
are capable of acquiring. With high levels of self-efficacy any task, however
great, can be tackled. High self-efficacy helps create feelings of serenity in
approaching the most difficult tasks and activities. However long it takes,
however tough the job, the individual feels competent to endure the hardship
and work through problems, barriers, and set-backs.
As a result of these influences,
self-efficacy beliefs are strong determinants and predictors of the level of
accomplishment that individuals finally attain. The social psychologist Bandura
(1986, 1997) made strong claims that only when we believe in our own personal
efficacy can we realise our full potential. More recently many eminent authorities
have supported the theory that true happiness can only be achieved when the
individual feels able to influence outcomes, and is aware of the steps
necessary to achieve particular goals.
Conversely, people with low
self-efficacy may believe that things are tougher than they really are, a
belief that fosters stress, depression, and a narrow vision of how best to
solve a problem. If this plan goes ahead unchallenged, without community input or explanation that stress, depression and narrow vision will be our future, and our children’s future, here in Karridale.
All we are asking for is an independent
review of the Karridale Hamlet Settlement Strategy, how is was developed and why we cannot have the "Shared Responsibility" for planning that must surely be an outcome from Mick Keelty's recommendations after the Perth Hills Fires. We need answers and
assurances. We acknowledge that we do need development here, but we want to be
able to shape the development of our locality so that it supports our aspirations,
current economic activities, our community and our culture.
Will you help this community avoid
a future of depression and mental health issues?
We need joined-up government
now, because Karridale will have a bleak future if the current scheme is
allowed to progress without an honest review and open dialogue explaining the
past six years of planning. We need full disclosure.
Peace be with you,
Heather Matthews – President
Karridale Progress Association
Inc
2 comments:
We have had an acknowledgement that Minister Hames has received our letter.
Our self-efficacy index is at an acceptable level
Minister Hames has replied, he doesn't deal with mental health. But he has forwarded my letter to the Hon Helen Morton MLC, who does have a portfolio that included mental health.
Of course if I had the stamina I could point Minister Hames to all the other health issues that are associated with bad planning, but for now I will wait with eager anticipation for the Hon Helen to reply.
Post a Comment