Apart from
being another piece of inappropriate development in a high bushfire risk area is
there a common factor in the development of Prevelly and the development of Karridale?
It’s the
developer; The Prevelly Development Trust.
For those of
you thinking the land in Karridale was being developed by Nutan Pty Ltd and
Juventus Pty Ltd, being given the name of the PDT might seem odd, unless you
remember the mysterious and elusive Mr Michael Hale.
Mr Hale,
described by his colleague Mr Pawluk in this section extracted from the “Community
Facilities Needs Plan”;
“A local
Karridale developer (Michael Hale, representing lot 100 to the north east of
the crossroads) arranged another community meeting which was held at the
Karridale Hall on 28 February 2007. This meeting was attended by approximately
60 people and again no record of the meeting was ever made available. The
purpose of this meeting was to explain the developer’s intentions for his site.”
Those of you
following along from the start of this blog might remember that there was a
local journalist present at the meeting. Since that time the developers have indulged
in a serious dose of cognitive dissonance. By changing their beliefs they have managed
to convince themselves that; no record of
the meeting was ever made available.
Changing
your beliefs can make it possible to live comfortably with uncomfortable truths;
many of the world’s most notorious criminal minds do this every day. They convince
themselves that their actions are perfectly acceptable. Often they manage it by
reminding themselves that what they are doing is legal; whilst conveniently forgetting
that they have expensive lobbyists to manipulate how the laws are framed and the
interpretation given to complicated legal rhetoric, and they also have
lobbyists to influence the decision makers.
But cognitive
dissonance does not change reality.
The reality
is that the local Augusta Margaret River Mail subsequently published the
journalist’s report and, as that newspaper is distributed freely throughout the
shire, it can hardly be considered a secret account of the meeting.
Of course
the developer’s intentions were explained that night. Those of us attending
were all offered the telephone number of Mr Hale’s public relations man, Gary Knight,
and told to make contact whenever we wished to have questions answered.
Some of us
did make contact, and some of us have been joining up the dots in the Gary
Knight saga ever since.
At the
meeting, but not reported, was the developer’s explanation of his relationships
with many of the Perth identities with whom he was closely involved, and with
whom he enjoyed beneficial and “special” arrangements. He even brought an
example of such a person along to create the illusion that were dealing with
some serious players.
Becoming
concerned that the activities of Gary Knight and Michael Hale in other parts of
Australia did not appear to be consistent with sustainable development some people
monitored events closely. The developments they were involved with were designed
to remove all the growth in land values from the residents purely for the
benefit of far distant investors.
In order to
find out the identity of the characters behind the development corporations
working their magic in Karridale it is necessary to undertake company searches,
and these need to be verifiable.
For me to do
that I needed the registered address of the corporation and the address of the one
man we know is authorised to speak for that corporation, Michael Hale. At the
meeting with no record Michael Hale was not prepared to give his own contact
details, he prefers to communicate through his Public Relations company, Gary
Knight and Associates, but Gary is not necessarily associated with Juventus Pty
Ltd, which was the corporation we were told was subdividing Karridale.
Hoping for
little, but doing my best, I contacted our shire planning officer and asked for
the addresses I needed.
Here is his
reply,
“Not sure of the currency of the postal address for
Michael Hale as he doesn’t appear on our rates database, although I believe he
participated in the KHSS process (i.e. is not registered as the owner of land
in our Shire, or at least not the primary contact for any company). Juventus is
the current owner of Lot 100, purchasing that land from (Mrs I think) McDonald
in 2010 and their contact details are:
Atf The Prevelly Development Trust
601/199 Regent Street
REDFERN NSW 2016”
So the
mysterious Michael Hale remains elusive.
I believe he participated – nobody can
confirm anything because shire records are just not maintained.
Not sure of the currency – what did this
mean? I was given no address at all for him, current or otherwise.
Can any
reader advise me who the Prevelly Development Trust are?
And why they
want to develop Karridale?
Bit off
their patch aren’t we?
Of course it
could just be a coincidence. It could be another, different, Prevelly DT, nothing
at all to do with the Prevelly we have in this shire.
At least Michael
Hale won’t have been bothered by the rate rise this year; he is a local developer
who apparently owns no land.
As explained
earlier his mate Richard Pawluk describes him, for the benefit of anyone reading
the planning documents, as “A local Karridale
developer.”
But is it
just possible that being described as “A
local Karridale developer” might give some readers the impression that at
least one local resident is going to gain some benefit from the subdividing of
farming land in Karridale?
Weasel words?
Has anyone approached the Prevelly Development Trust for cash to develop the second access road? If the design was not fit for the purpose should they be asked to provide a remedy?
No comments:
Post a Comment